Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwYd6CQBEYuHp6_Szp_sn4im7UaKLSVKaG+D_CRA6iy=6g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
>> and back-branches?
>
> Sounds sensible to me.


​+1
 
I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
extension they are writing
​ [...]


-1​
 

​David J.​

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types
Следующее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: array of domain types