Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
От | Joachim Wieland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinUCX6NsegfpY4Py0cjPCfV6jva3tnQtWkuAtgh@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Nope ... those strings are just helpful comments, they aren't really > guaranteed to be unique identifiers. In any case, it seems unlikely > that a user could expect to get the more complicated cases exactly right > other than by consulting "pg_dump | pg_restore -l" output. Which makes > the use-case kind of dubious to me. In which case would the catalogId, i.e. (tableoid, oid) not be unique? Or do you rather mean that it does not necessarily refer to the same object if that object got somehow recreated or that it could be different on different installations of the same database? Thanks, Joachim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: