Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6606.1290579343@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> Well, very little about pg_dump is very [E], IMNSHO. The question in my >> mind here is what format the list file will take > I was thinking same format as pg_restore -l, only without the dumpIDs. Nope ... those strings are just helpful comments, they aren't really guaranteed to be unique identifiers. In any case, it seems unlikely that a user could expect to get the more complicated cases exactly right other than by consulting "pg_dump | pg_restore -l" output. Which makes the use-case kind of dubious to me. I don't say that this wouldn't be a useful feature, but you need a better spec than this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: