Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4CED2380.3010902@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/24/2010 09:05 AM, Joachim Wieland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Nope ... those strings are just helpful comments, they aren't really >> guaranteed to be unique identifiers. In any case, it seems unlikely >> that a user could expect to get the more complicated cases exactly right >> other than by consulting "pg_dump | pg_restore -l" output. Which makes >> the use-case kind of dubious to me. > In which case would the catalogId, i.e. (tableoid, oid) not be unique? > Or do you rather mean that it does not necessarily refer to the same > object if that object got somehow recreated or that it could be > different on different installations of the same database? It would be unique, but a pain in the neck for users to get. Robert's idea will have more traction with users. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: