Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL
От | Jonathan Gennick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9971617099.20050810203208@oreilly.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL
Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 7:28:38 PM, Simon Riggs (simon@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: SR> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 18:56 -0400, Jonathan Gennick wrote: >> BTW, according to Bookscan PostgreSQL accounts for only $47k >> of revenue so far this year, less actually than Lisp SR> Hi Jonathan, SR> Good to have you post and very interesting too. SR> You had me until that statement above, cos that just sounds too much SR> like a self fulfilling prophecy.... especially since, as we know, the SR> current books are all out of date. I don't doubt that the out-of-date books hurt sales. That's very likely true. Whenever you look at those Bookscan numbers you have to give a bit of thought pub dates. But the numbers above are the numbers that Bookscan reports. Sometimes you have to think about titles too. I only searched on the word "PostgreSQL". Do most PostgreSQL books have that word in the title? Perhaps so, but for other topics it isn't quite so easy to pin down search terms that take in the entire topic of interest. And Bookscan numbers represent the past, which may or may not correlate to the future. Best regards, Jonathan Gennick Editor, O'Reilly Media 906.387.1698 mailto:jgennick@oreilly.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: