Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050810214148.J1002@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL (Jonathan Gennick <jgennick@oreilly.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Publishing and PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Jonathan Gennick wrote: > Wednesday, August 10, 2005, 7:28:38 PM, Simon Riggs (simon@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > SR> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 18:56 -0400, Jonathan Gennick wrote: >>> BTW, according to Bookscan PostgreSQL accounts for only $47k >>> of revenue so far this year, less actually than Lisp > > SR> Hi Jonathan, > > SR> Good to have you post and very interesting too. > > SR> You had me until that statement above, cos that just sounds too much > SR> like a self fulfilling prophecy.... especially since, as we know, the > SR> current books are all out of date. > > I don't doubt that the out-of-date books hurt sales. That's very > likely true. Whenever you look at those Bookscan numbers you have to > give a bit of thought pub dates. But the numbers above are the numbers > that Bookscan reports. > > Sometimes you have to think about titles too. I only searched on the > word "PostgreSQL". Do most PostgreSQL books have that word in the > title? Perhaps so, but for other topics it isn't quite so easy to pin > down search terms that take in the entire topic of interest. > > And Bookscan numbers represent the past, which may or may not > correlate to the future. The past what? is there a way of seeing last years #s, or the year before? To get some sort of 'histogram of sales'? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: