Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal
От | dg@illustra.com (David Gould) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9803241927.AA18842@hawk.illustra.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal (<geek+@cmu.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal
Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Speaking of data type removal, I was wondering if there were a better > way to handle arrays of types. From looking in the catalog, it > appears that for each type, there is also declared a similar type, > which is the array version. It seems that arrays should be considered > more flags on a field, than a field type in themselves. Does this > make sense to anybody else? Is an array the same thing as a scalar? What would be the benefit of making arrays "flags on a field" instead of a "field type in themselves". Seriously, how would this improve _anything_? The postgres type system is very flexible and powerful as is. What is the problem this is trying to solve? What is the motivation for data type removal? -dg David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 Informix Software (No, really) 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 - Linux. Not because it is free. Because it is better.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: