Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.3.96.980324172538.929C-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal (dg@illustra.com (David Gould)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, David Gould wrote: > What is the motivation for data type removal? There appear to be two "motivations" from what I'm hearing: 1. reduced memory footprint 2. reduced "disk" footprint From what I've been able to gather, I believe that ppl are expecting that the result is a faster server, based on less "perceived" fat...nobody has yet been able to prove that though, which I believe Darren is working on. Part of this does have me thinking though, in that one of the *big* features that I perceived PostgreSQL to have was the fact that it was/is very easy to extend our datatypes and functions without having to recompile the server. So, right now, I'm kinda sitting on the fence in that I'm curious if we *are* taking anything away by moving the geometrics from inside of the server to a loadable module, given that the fact that we *are* able to do that is what appears to be one of our major points of "uniqueness"... Right now, there has been alot of speculation as to whether or not moving the geometrics into a loadable module or not would gain (or lose, for that matter) us anything... Let's say we have a $prefix/modules directory, where we move the geometrics stuff into. And, let's say we have an 'loadmod' command added that, if someone did 'loadmod geometrics;' from psql, it loaded up the geometrics module...would we have the *same* functionality as if it were compiled in, like it is now? Or we would lose something? To me, this is one of the *biggest* features of PostgreSQL, the fact that we can easily add in new features without recompiling...but without seeing actual numbers (performance as well as "disk"), we can discuss this till we are blue in the face. Darren...if you want to provide us with a working model of this, using the geometrics, so be it...I won't say that it will or won't be integrated without seeing this in operation, and without seeing some *actual* benefit to it...as the saying goes "Talk is Cheap..." So, I say, let's leave this as a "to be researched" and wait for something concrete to look at... Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: