Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | emacs-smtp-20243-13591-57644-936428@export.andrew.cmu.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Data type removal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Speaking of data type removal, I was wondering if there were a better way to handle arrays of types. From looking in the catalog, it appears that for each type, there is also declared a similar type, which is the array version. It seems that arrays should be considered more flags on a field, than a field type in themselves. Does this make sense to anybody else? - -- ===================================================================== | JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. | | After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? | ===================================================================== | Finger geek@andrew.cmu.edu for my public key. | ===================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQBVAwUBNRfhLIdzVnzma+gdAQGUvwH8CWMmMo633do81jgZd+pPPJPW481nfwB9 awec8H9PjZ3QsShK4cSIJmC9Yg+IMBp3E+goHYssAO4X42Nf15+0EA== =8YSU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: