Re: Quality of email postings

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:

> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>
>>> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
>>> advocacy list.  It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
>>> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions.  I am
>>> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
>>> and more focus in emails.
>>
>> I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team.
>> Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them
>> and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional
>> appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list.
>
> I can only assume that this is a joke but with Greg I can never tell. :P

A more biting insult I've never seen :(

I'll have to try harder to be more outrageous in future.

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com