Re: Quality of email postings

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>
>> Gregory Stark wrote:
>>> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>>
>>>> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the
>>>> advocacy list.  It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and
>>>> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions.  I am
>>>> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track,
>>>> and more focus in emails.
>>> I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team.
>>> Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them
>>> and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional
>>> appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list.
>> I can only assume that this is a joke but with Greg I can never tell. :P
>
> A more biting insult I've never seen :(

I am sorry, I really did not mean it to be an insult.

>
> I'll have to try harder to be more outrageous in future.
>

Well the way you right makes it difficult. I *thought* you were being
sarcastic but I wasn't sure.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- --

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGvHSsATb/zqfZUUQRAnO+AJwOtnevg696AawoX2ScTg/bRhNT8wCeNOGF
vH9jhpWJb7dqWQBZzAEPU3Y=
=q/cv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----