Re: Quality of email postings
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quality of email postings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46BC6C74.3070708@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Quality of email postings (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Quality of email postings
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Stark wrote: > "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > >> I am getting concerned about the quality of email traffic on the >> advocacy list. It seems postings are often not fully formed ideas and >> that threads frequently go on and on with few conclusions. I am >> thinking there has to be more leadership in keeping threads on track, >> and more focus in emails. > > I propose that we restrict advocacy to be writable by only the www team. > Everyone else can send their suggested posts to them and they can edit them > and post them. That way the discussions will represent only a professional > appearance and we can avoid having porn posted on the advocacy mailing list. I can only assume that this is a joke but with Greg I can never tell. :P Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGvGx0ATb/zqfZUUQRAkprAJ9DzxNOfz6XXznEPhWF7++uUbD00wCgjttv Q/E8Z8VZN3+CY4H5UDl7k1Y= =gt0A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: