Re: Another swing at JSON
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another swing at JSON |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 87d3l9109w.fsf@hi-media-techno.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Another swing at JSON (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Another swing at JSON
Re: Another swing at JSON Re: Another swing at JSON |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway? Just assume > that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just > work. > > We've gone over this a dozen times in the past. +1 I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider. This and removing module_pathname in the control files to just use $libdir/contrib in the .sql files. That would set a better example to people who want to make their own extensions, as the general case is that those will not get into contrib. I think we should lower the differences between contrib and external extensions, so that contrib is only about who maintains the code and distribute the extension. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: