Re: Another swing at JSON
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Another swing at JSON |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28528.1301770741@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Another swing at JSON (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Another swing at JSON
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes: > This and removing module_pathname in the control files to just use > $libdir/contrib in the .sql files. That would set a better example to > people who want to make their own extensions, as the general case is > that those will not get into contrib. I'm not sure it's a better example. We considered doing that before, and decided not to on the grounds that using MODULE_PATHNAME avoids hard-wiring the name of the shared library into the SQL scripts. Also, IIRC, there are a couple of contrib modules where there's an actual problem in doing it like that; though I'm unable to recall details as I'm fighting a head cold at the moment. My original intention when I started working with the extensions patch had in fact been to do what you suggest above, but I was convinced not to. I don't think we should reverse that decision at the last minute. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: