Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070909160944h7732fee6oa4673c5fd6a5b0ce@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
|
Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> wrote: > At 2009-09-14 21:08:56 -0400, robertmhaas@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Logging configuration changes >> - Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> > > I reviewed this patch. It's fine. Ready for committer as-is. > > But I suggested some minor changes that I thought were useful, and > posted a new version of the patch including those changes. Besides > that, I posted a patch to implement a suggestion Peter made in his > original posting. > > What status should I assign the patch now? It's "Needs Review", in > a sense, but also "Waiting on Author", "Ready for Committer", and > "Returned with Feedback" ;-) > > The patch is completely trivial, before and after, so I feel a bit silly > even to ask this question. Should I just advance it to "Ready"? Yep, Ready for Committer sounds good to me. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: