Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 603c8f070909160944g7bac4e78w6c03777baa978233@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> wrote: >> At 2009-09-14 21:08:56 -0400, robertmhaas@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> Logging configuration changes >>> - Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> >> >> I reviewed this patch. It's fine. Ready for committer as-is. >> >> But I suggested some minor changes that I thought were useful, and >> posted a new version of the patch including those changes. Besides >> that, I posted a patch to implement a suggestion Peter made in his >> original posting. >> >> What status should I assign the patch now? It's "Needs Review", in >> a sense, but also "Waiting on Author", "Ready for Committer", and >> "Returned with Feedback" ;-) >> >> The patch is completely trivial, before and after, so I feel a bit silly >> even to ask this question. Should I just advance it to "Ready"? > > Yep, Ready for Committer sounds good to me. Oh, and make sure to add a comment of type "Patch" with a link to your version of the patch. ...Robert
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: