Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
От | Abhijit Menon-Sen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20090916053851.GA9771@toroid.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CF 2009-09: initial reviewing assignments
|
Список | pgsql-rrreviewers |
At 2009-09-14 21:08:56 -0400, robertmhaas@gmail.com wrote: > > Logging configuration changes > - Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> I reviewed this patch. It's fine. Ready for committer as-is. But I suggested some minor changes that I thought were useful, and posted a new version of the patch including those changes. Besides that, I posted a patch to implement a suggestion Peter made in his original posting. What status should I assign the patch now? It's "Needs Review", in a sense, but also "Waiting on Author", "Ready for Committer", and "Returned with Feedback" ;-) The patch is completely trivial, before and after, so I feel a bit silly even to ask this question. Should I just advance it to "Ready"? (I suppose my review will show up on -hackers by the time this message shows up on -rrreviewers.) -- ams
В списке pgsql-rrreviewers по дате отправления: