Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519D7D60.1060804@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 5/22/13 10:04 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Make that quite a few capacitors (top right corner): > http://regmedia.co.uk/2013/05/07/m500_4.jpg There are some more shots and descriptions of the internals in the excellent review at http://techreport.com/review/24666/crucial-m500-ssd-reviewed That also highlights the big problem with this drive that's kept me from buying one so far: "Unlike rivals Intel and Samsung, Crucial doesn't provide utility software with a built-in health indicator. The M500's payload of SMART attributes doesn't contain any references to flash wear or bytes written, either. Several of the SMART attributes are labeled "Vendor-specific," but you'll need to guess what they track and read the associated values using third-party software." That's a serious problem for most business use of this sort of drive. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: