Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519D7E54.4000806@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 23/05/13 14:22, Greg Smith wrote: > On 5/22/13 10:04 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> Make that quite a few capacitors (top right corner): >> http://regmedia.co.uk/2013/05/07/m500_4.jpg > > There are some more shots and descriptions of the internals in the > excellent review at > http://techreport.com/review/24666/crucial-m500-ssd-reviewed > > That also highlights the big problem with this drive that's kept me > from buying one so far: > > "Unlike rivals Intel and Samsung, Crucial doesn't provide utility > software with a built-in health indicator. The M500's payload of SMART > attributes doesn't contain any references to flash wear or bytes > written, either. Several of the SMART attributes are labeled > "Vendor-specific," but you'll need to guess what they track and read > the associated values using third-party software." > > That's a serious problem for most business use of this sort of drive. > Agreed - I was thinking the same thing! Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: