Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519D7930.2040308@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 23/05/13 13:32, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > On 23/05/13 13:01, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >> On 05/22/2013 04:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake >>> <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>>> I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from >>>> Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the >>>> m500 is >>>> power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes >>>> written (TBW), >>>> equal to 40GB per day for 5 years . >>> >>> I don't think the m500 is power safe (nor is any drive at the <1$/gb >>> price point). >> >> According the the data sheet it is power safe. >> >> http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650 >> http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd >> >> > > Yeah - they apparently have a capacitor on board. > Make that quite a few capacitors (top right corner): http://regmedia.co.uk/2013/05/07/m500_4.jpg
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: