Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 519D71AD.4080606@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 23/05/13 13:01, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 05/22/2013 04:37 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Joshua D. Drake >> <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> I am curious how the 710 or S3700 stacks up against the new M500 from >>> Crucial? I know Intel is kind of the goto for these things but the >>> m500 is >>> power off protected and rated at: Endurance: 72TB total bytes >>> written (TBW), >>> equal to 40GB per day for 5 years . >> >> I don't think the m500 is power safe (nor is any drive at the <1$/gb >> price point). > > According the the data sheet it is power safe. > > http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650 > http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd > > Yeah - they apparently have a capacitor on board. Their write endurance is where they don't compare so favorably to the S3700 (they are *much* cheaper mind you): - M500 120GB drive: 40GB per day for 5 years - S3700 100GB drive: 1000GB per day for 5 years But great to see more reasonably priced SSD with power off protection. Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: