Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

Michael Paquier  writes:
> So, any particular feelings about this patch?  This has been around
> for a couple of months/years now, so it could be a good time to do the
> switch now rather than wait an extra year, or even the beginning of
> the next release cycle.  And the buildfarm is already able to handle
> that in its code based on the last release, by skipping the upgrade
> check if it finds a pg_upgrade/t/ subdirectory.

There's still about a third of the buildfarm running older
client releases --- I count

      2 REL_8
      2 REL_10
     13 REL_11
      6 REL_12
     16 REL_13.1
     89 REL_14

How well does this patch work with pre-14 buildfarm clients?

			regards, tom lane