Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Дата
Msg-id YkbnpriYEAagZ2wH@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:01:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:51:59PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> Is diff -q defined somewhere ?  I can't find it in postgres sources nor in
>> sources for bf client.
>
> 322becb has added such a call, at the end of 002_pg_upgrade.pl.
> vcregress.pl also has one before this commit.

The Windows animals seem to be in good shape, except hamerkop that
dies on "vcregress upgradecheck" when the TAP tests are disabled
causing the buildfarm client to stop.  My idea to use upgradecheck
leads to more code than just moving the test to bincheck so let's
reuse the suggestion from Andres upthread and disable completely
upgradecheck, keeping the target around only for compatibility.  The
attached does that, and the test of pg_upgrade would go through
bincheck instead.

It is late here, I'll try to get that patched up tomorrow.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_rewind copies
Следующее
От: Pavel Borisov
Дата:
Сообщение: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do?