Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
От | Zdenek Kotala |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4900942B.5080008@sun.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a): > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >> Currently in heaptuple.c we have duplicated code. heap_deformtuple and >> heap_formtuple are mark as a obsolete interface. Is any reason to have still >> them? I know that they are still used on many places, but is there any stopper >> to keep these function alive? > > Well, aside from the gruntwork needed to convert all the core code that > still uses the old APIs, there's the prospect of breaking extension > modules that still use the old APIs. It's kind of annoying to have two > copies of that code, but less annoying than removing it would be ... > What's about convert null array to boolean and call heap_form_tuple? Zdenek -- Zdenek Kotala Sun Microsystems Prague, Czech Republic http://sun.com/postgresql
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: