Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20081023151412.GA4845@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Tom Lane napsal(a): >> Well, aside from the gruntwork needed to convert all the core code that >> still uses the old APIs, there's the prospect of breaking extension >> modules that still use the old APIs. It's kind of annoying to have two >> copies of that code, but less annoying than removing it would be ... > > What's about convert null array to boolean and call heap_form_tuple? Agreed, I started doing that some time ago ... it doesn't seem all that complicated. We could try to add a #warning if an external module uses the deprecated interface, for a couple of releases, and then perhaps drop it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: