Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4481.1224774487@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple?
Re: Any reason to have heap_(de)formtuple? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > Currently in heaptuple.c we have duplicated code. heap_deformtuple and > heap_formtuple are mark as a obsolete interface. Is any reason to have still > them? I know that they are still used on many places, but is there any stopper > to keep these function alive? Well, aside from the gruntwork needed to convert all the core code that still uses the old APIs, there's the prospect of breaking extension modules that still use the old APIs. It's kind of annoying to have two copies of that code, but less annoying than removing it would be ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: