PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
От | Tony Caduto |
---|---|
Тема | PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46CD145F.90809@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Список | pgsql-general |
Check it out here: http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb When comparing in the grid the only major advantage FB has is probably BLOB support. PG only suppports 1 gb while FB supports 32gb. Bytea is pretty slow as well when compared to the FB BLOB support. The other area is Character sets and collation. They support it at a field level as well as the database. Other than that I would say PG kicks butt. If there is any interest I could also add MySQL 5.0 to the mix as the third column. Later, Tony
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: