Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0708231519270.20869@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Tony Caduto wrote: > If there is any interest I could also add MySQL 5.0 to the mix as the third > column. As already mentioned, MyISAM and InnoDB should get their own columns. This is a really good comparision, focusing on features that I think people understand rather than so much on technical trivia. Someone else mentioned moving it onto the Wiki. Questions that pop into my head: -Tony, would be you be comfortable with your work being assimilated into a larger table that was hosted somewhere else but credited yours as a source? -Is the Wiki the right place to build this table at? Large Wiki tables get very difficult to manage. It may be easier to build the table in something else and then have that generate markup instead. I'd rather edit this in a spreadsheet and write something to massage that into final form than do all the edits within the Wikipedia editor. -If this is going to turn into the grand feature comparision table, everyone might as well be thinking from day one that inevitably there will be columns for Oracle (with a volunteer to fill out already), SQL Server, DB2, etc. and plan a useful way to manage all that data from the beginning. That's another reason why the Wiki is a bad way to cope with this data; adding another column is a painful and error-prone operation. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: