Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46CD4A80.8060908@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tony Caduto wrote: > Check it out here: > > http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb Couple of corrections Tony: - You don't necessarily need to stop the postmaster to take a filesystem backup - http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-BASE-BACKUP. Obviously that assumes logs will be replayed during recovery. - The native win32 port will run on FAT32, we just prevent the installer from initdb'ing on such a partition. You can do it manually however, but tablespaces won't work. I'm a little puzzled about why you list multi-threaded architecture as a feature - on Windows it's a little more efficient of course, but the multi-process architecture is arguably far more robust, and certainly used to be more portable (I'm not sure that's still the case for platforms we actually care about). Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: