Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4496.957288462@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now >> work with 7.0? If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver >> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs. If the answer is >> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got. > As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas. The driver must > have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version. Only since I > installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able. So the version currently in CVS has seen hardly any testing either? Man, you really know how to make a guy feel comfortable :-( Given that, we might as well let Peter have the extra day or two to bring the CVS version to the best state he can. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: