Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200005021737.NAA22705@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now > >> work with 7.0? If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver > >> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs. If the answer is > >> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got. > > > As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas. The driver must > > have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version. Only since I > > installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able. > > So the version currently in CVS has seen hardly any testing either? > Man, you really know how to make a guy feel comfortable :-( Up to then, it was using the code in postgresql. Now it is using org/postgresql directory, and they are different. postgresql is the 6.5.* driver, and org/postgresql is the 7.0 driver. > Given that, we might as well let Peter have the extra day or two > to bring the CVS version to the best state he can. Yea, it had that effect on me too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: