Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> >> Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.
> 
> > I would vote that this is important enough that it should wait, but no
> > one has raised the issue until now so we haven't discussed it.
> 
> My two cents: I wouldn't object to postponing release a day or so for
> it, *but* if what we're getting is an un-beta-tested driver then my
> level of enthusiasm drops considerably.  I'd rather say "it'll get
> fixed in 7.0.1, after a decent testing interval for the new driver".
> 
> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
> work with 7.0?  If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs.  If the answer is
> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.

As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas.  The driver must
have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version.  Only since I
installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026