Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 446DEE4D.8030705@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote: >> The reality is that MySQL is widely supported by some very, shall we say, >> "interesting" open source projects and using these products with >> PostgreSQL would be a plus. > > The biggest headache I find with using postgres is that various GPL > licenced programs have trouble directly shipping postgresql support > because of our use of OpenSSL. Each and every one of those program > needs to add an exception to their licence for distributors to > distribute postgresql support. Why would that be the case... OpenSSL and PostgreSQL both are BSD licensed... Am I missing something? Joshua D. Drake > > I'm thinking particularly of FreeRadius but there are others. More than > once I thought while waiting for stuff to compile: if I'd chosen mysql > I'd be done by now... > > Have a nice day, -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutionssince 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: