Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060519161538.GF9919@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > >On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote: > >>The reality is that MySQL is widely supported by some very, shall we say, > >>"interesting" open source projects and using these products with > >>PostgreSQL would be a plus. > > > >The biggest headache I find with using postgres is that various GPL > >licenced programs have trouble directly shipping postgresql support > >because of our use of OpenSSL. Each and every one of those program > >needs to add an exception to their licence for distributors to > >distribute postgresql support. > > Why would that be the case... OpenSSL and PostgreSQL both are BSD > licensed... Am I missing something? Advertising clause. PostgreSQL doesn't have it, OpenSSL does. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: