Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 446DF0C1.3070200@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: >> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:58:11PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote: >>> The reality is that MySQL is widely supported by some very, shall we >>> say, >>> "interesting" open source projects and using these products with >>> PostgreSQL would be a plus. >> >> The biggest headache I find with using postgres is that various GPL >> licenced programs have trouble directly shipping postgresql support >> because of our use of OpenSSL. Each and every one of those program >> needs to add an exception to their licence for distributors to >> distribute postgresql support. > > Why would that be the case... OpenSSL and PostgreSQL both are BSD > licensed... Am I missing something? http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 Of course, on that reasoning, they would need to provide a similar exception for libpq with or without openssl. More and more I love the fact that we don't play these games. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: