Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | David Boreham |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437B4773.1040404@boreham.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Список | pgsql-performance |
>Spend a fortune on dual core CPUs and then buy crappy disks... I bet >for most applications this system will be IO bound, and you will see a >nice lot of drive failures in the first year of operation with >consumer grade drives. I guess I've never bought into the vendor story that there are two reliability grades. Why would they bother making two different kinds of bearing, motor etc ? Seems like it's more likely an excuse to justify higher prices. In my experience the expensive SCSI drives I own break frequently while the cheapo desktop drives just keep chunking along (modulo certain products that have a specific known reliability problem). I'd expect that a larger number of hotter drives will give a less reliable system than a smaller number of cooler ones.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: