Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437B54A9.5070104@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> > I guess I've never bought into the vendor story that there are > two reliability grades. Why would they bother making two > different kinds of bearing, motor etc ? Seems like it's more > likely an excuse to justify higher prices. In my experience the > expensive SCSI drives I own break frequently while the cheapo > desktop drives just keep chunking along (modulo certain products > that have a specific known reliability problem). I don't know if the reliability grade is true or not but what I can tell you is that I have scsi drives that are 5+ years old that still work without issue. I have never had an IDE drive last longer than 3 years (when used in production). That being said, so what. That is what raid is for. You loose a drive and hot swap it back in. Heck keep a hotspare in the trays. Joshua D. Drake > > I'd expect that a larger number of hotter drives will give a less > reliable > system than a smaller number of cooler ones. > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: