Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( (Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Список | pgsql-performance |
>> I agree - you can get a very good one from www.acmemicro.com or >> www.rackable.com with 8x 400GB SATA disks and the new 3Ware 9550SX SATA >> RAID controller for about $6K with two Opteron 272 CPUs and 8GB of RAM >> on a Tyan 2882 motherboard. We get about 400MB/s sustained disk read >> performance on these (with tuning) on Linux using the xfs filesystem, >> which is one of the most critical factors for large databases. >> >> > > Spend a fortune on dual core CPUs and then buy crappy disks... I bet > for most applications this system will be IO bound, and you will see a > nice lot of drive failures in the first year of operation with > consumer grade drives. > There is nothing wrong with using SATA disks and they perform very well. The catch is, make sure you have a battery back up on the raid controller. > Spend your money on better Disks, and don't bother with Dual Core IMHO > unless you can prove the need for it. > The reason you want the dual core cpus is that PostgreSQL can only execute 1 query per cpu at a time, so the application will see a big boost in overall transactional velocity if you push two dual-core cpus into the machine. Joshua D. Drake > Alex > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: