Re: LGPL

Tom Lane wrote:

>What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
>in a completely non-GPL environment.  If that were not so then I think
>we'd have some license issues.  But the fact that building PG in a
>GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
>point of view.  You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
>environment.
>  
>
So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?

Peter