Re: LGPL

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 08:43:01 +0100, Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
> >in a completely non-GPL environment.  If that were not so then I think
> >we'd have some license issues.  But the fact that building PG in a
> >GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
> >point of view.  You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
> >environment.
> > 
> >
> So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?

Neither using GNU make or gcc make to buld a binary make the resulting binary
bound by the GPL.