Re: LGPL
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LGPL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9219.1119072376@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LGPL ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: LGPL
Re: LGPL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: >> With libreadline, we are not taking their code or distributing it, but >> merely linking to it if it exists. > But we are also requiring it. The rpms won't install unless readline is > available. The RPMs require it --- not our source code. Since the RPMs can only work atop a GPL OS (Linux), it hardly matters in that context. What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres in a completely non-GPL environment. If that were not so then I think we'd have some license issues. But the fact that building PG in a GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my point of view. You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that environment. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: