Re: PostgreSQL in the press again

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> ... does that help?
>
Ok, so to abbreviate what you and Josh writes into what I had in mind
(??? denotes my own lack of further knowledge):

Master + read-only slaves:
  - Slony-I when all sites are trusted
  - dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave assignment
  - Mammoth Replicator, proprietary ???
  - erServer ???

Multi-master:
  - C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA
  - pgPool, not transaction safe ???
(- future, the stuff Jan is working on and Postgres-R)

Perhaps some info about which solutions that are PostgreSQL specific and
which are database agnostic should be added.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren