Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200411092204.04667.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again (Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Thomas Hallgren wrote: > Master + read-only slaves: > - Slony-I when all sites are trusted > - dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave > assignment - Mammoth Replicator, proprietary ??? > - erServer ??? That begs the question in turn why there are so many master/slave replication solutions. I mean, I don't care, but this categorization doesn't really answer the original question. > Multi-master: > - C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA > - pgPool, not transaction safe ??? These are not multimaster solutions in the sense that you can write to any one of multiple hosts. In a sense, they are really master/slave solutions with the program components distributed differently. To write, you always have to go through one host. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: