Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041109202310.GG17541@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again (Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:13:00PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote: > > Master + read-only slaves: > - Slony-I when all sites are trusted > - dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave assignment You can do the table-based trick with Slony, too. In fact, AFAIK, you can do it with every async system. > - erServer ??? I don't know if anyone is stepping up to take over the BSD version, but as far as I'm concerned, it's a dead letter. I know there is some development going on with it at PgSQL, Inc, though. > - C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA > - pgPool, not transaction safe ??? I think the latter would be, too, if Pg had XA. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: