Re: v14 mechanical code beautification patches
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: v14 mechanical code beautification patches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4070379.1620256115@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: v14 mechanical code beautification patches (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: v14 mechanical code beautification patches
Re: v14 mechanical code beautification patches |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 02:18:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I notice that we also list this as a pre-beta task in >> src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES: >> * Update inet/cidr data types with newest Bind patches >> However, I can't recall that anyone has ever done any such thing; >> and at this point, any attempt to re-sync that code would likely >> be a rather major task. Should we take that off the checklist? > I think it is related to these files: > src/backend/utils/adt/inet_cidr_ntop.c > src/backend/utils/adt/inet_net_pton.c > which have at the top: > * Copyright (c) 2004 by Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC") > * Copyright (c) 1996,1999 by Internet Software Consortium. > but I am not sure we still need to update those, so I would remove it. I dug in the archives and found the thread that prompted you to add that bullet item: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/200502021700.j12H05j20872%40candle.pha.pa.us which made the point that those were moving targets back in 2005. I doubt they still are, so I don't see much point in keeping this in the checklist. (There may or may not be value in doing a one-time check to see if we've missed anything.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: