Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 404c0f98ef0f040c4d122803c5b766e8@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the > right symbol for this. We already have letter flags which control > object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of > independent of those flags, like '+' now. I am thinking maybe '&' is > the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'. What problem are we trying to solve here that is not already solved by using 'S' for system tables, which has been in use in psql for over a decade now? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200901201026 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkl17psACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjdRACgoAJPOBsWYPf420KLl/7tuPTa By0AoORZBVnszD5SmGUpKvBHR7YFES7r =AILx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: