Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200901201544.n0KFi6x29926@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: [ There is text before PGP section. ] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > > > In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the > > right symbol for this. We already have letter flags which control > > object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of > > independent of those flags, like '+' now. I am thinking maybe '&' is > > the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'. > > What problem are we trying to solve here that is not already solved by > using 'S' for system tables, which has been in use in psql for over a > decade now? Well, the 'S' behavior used to be only system, now it is _add_ system. Anyway, 'S' is still probably the best choice. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: