Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200901201517.n0KFHNn24949@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > > Here is what I hope is a consensus patch. It adds 'A' to show all > > objects, including system ones. It turns out that this is how 'S' works > > now in CVS, but 'S' is unclear because it suggests just system objects; > > 'A' for show 'all' objects seems clearer. > > I think it's probably fine for "S" to mean "include system objects" > rather than "show only system objects". Everyone should be relatively > used to "S" by now; I think it's less confusing to keep the same > letter even if the behavior has been adjusted somewhat. Though others > may disagree? OK, so you are saying you like the behavior in current CVS, which uses 'S' as you described. In thinking last night, I am now wondering if a letter is really the right symbol for this. We already have letter flags which control object type selection, but the system table addition is kind of independent of those flags, like '+' now. I am thinking maybe '&' is the right symbol rather than 'A' or 'S'. \df and \df& '&' would stand for "and system objects". We could use '*' but that might be confused with a wildcard symbol. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: