The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > One question I have is where will the primary repository be, at your
> > site or on postgresql.org? We need to know because if it is at your
> > site, we need to get the newest version before each release.
>
> From my talks with David Hartwig, they will be supplying us with
> patches required to keep the odbc driver in our source tree up to
> date...the newest binary for it will reside on their site, and mirrored to
> our site.
>
> Byronn...if you are maintaining the odbc code, would having direct
> access to the CVS repository make keeping things in sync easier for you?
> The purpose of bringing the source code into our tree was/is to prevent
> fragmentation of development as well as keep it "all in one place" for
> those using it...
>
> David? Comments?
Point of clarification: Byron works for me at Insight. We usually keep him
locked up. But he got out yesterday. :) Actually he has done all of the
coding on the project under my direction. He deserves 99% of the credit for
anything contributed by Insight to the ODBC project. To date, I have been doing
most of the correspondence in an attempt to speak as one voice on matters of
project management.
Unfortunately, we do not have a Unix box at the office with a connection to the
internet. :( We dial in from or PCs to get the source or to update our pages
located at out ISP. I have a Linux box at home and have gotten CVSup up. It
would be nice if we had update privileges for the ODBC stuff.. Is CVSup capable
of granting update privileges to only one directory?
Call me crazy, but our goal is to help make PostgreSQL a viable alternative in
commercial applications. I hope we can be more of a help than a hindrance.