Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 31632.1391554047@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: >> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is >> still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so >> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after >> a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not >> an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the >> MSVC build faster? > Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have > major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4" > on a decent linux box. I wonder if ccache exists for Mingw. That thing makes a huge difference in the perceived build speed ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: